Bootstrap vs Google Material Design Lite – Which one is Better?
The success of the project depends on the technology used for the development process. This is the era of the latest and advanced technologies where everyone is in the race of achieving better business prospects by maintaining the huge client base. Bootstrap vs Google Material Design Lite is the hottest topic in the internet among web developers
- Visit Company Profile
- Explore Career
- Submit Your Application
- Latest Projects
- Request for Project Proposal
- Client Testmonails
Today, customers are more conscious about their brand reputation, which can only be established when they use the high-tech development platforms to deliver unbeatable business solutions. It has been analyzed that business enterprises using traditional development platforms are getting less business in comparison to the businesses using the latest technologies.
It is so, because, people have become smarter and want to have a website that has been designed with robust structure and advanced functionality.
Nowadays, Bootstrap and Google’s Material Design Lite are considered the best & reliable website and web app development platforms that provide out of the box development facility to the developers.
Google’s Material Design Lite
Comparison between Bootstrap and Material Design frameworks:
|1||Invented by the Google Team.||Introduced by Twitter.|
|2||Helps to add material design look & feel to the websites.||Used for designing front-end websites and web applications.|
|3||Material Design Lite strictly follows the defined pattern of Material Design Concept which consists of plenty of information regarding breakpoints, metrics, typography, animations and the other codeable values.||It is an open source web framework which supports easier and faster web development.|
|4||No doubt, you can customize the MDL, but, it may result in losing the concept of Material Design throughout the project.||Bootstrap works like a base language that can be easily customized as per the project requirements.|
|5||Applications based on MDL run on npm and bower package managers. And, it runs independently.||It has the jQuery dependency.|
|6||It supports the JS frameworks of Angular Material and React Material User Interface.||Always supports JS frameworks such as React Bootstrap and Angular UI Bootstrap.|
|7||It is built using the SCSS preprocessor.||It also uses LESS (a dynamic style sheet language) & SAAS (syntactically awesome style sheets) version to build websites.|
|9||It requires Gulp to build all the design processes.||Uses Grunt to build and run processes.|
|10||MDL is supported by a number of components such as mega footer, cards, toggle switches and slider inputs that are not applicable for Bootstrap.||Bootstrap supports components such as popover, panel, thumbnails, breadcrumb, wells and inline alerts that are not available for the Google’s Material Design Lite.|
|11||As Google recently introduced MDL, so, it has less number of extensions in comparison to Bootstrap. But, its community is growing rapidly, so users can expect more extensions in the future.||Apart from the bower and npmpackage managers, Bootstrap is also available on composer manager.|
|12||MDL is fully supported on all the major browsers such as Chrome, IE 10+, Firefox, Chrome for Android, Opera and Safari Mobile.||When it comes to the browser support, it ensures compatibility with all the major browsers. It has also maintained a backward compatibility up to Internet Explorer 8.|
|13||Applications built on MDL uses the base font Roboto.||Solutions based on Bootstrap usually have the base font named Helvetica Neue.|
|14||With this development platform, developers can have the color variations usually in two color shades.||Users can also visualize color variations in the Bootstrap websites as these are built using context based colors such as info, primary, warning and danger.|
|15||The file size of Material Design Lite applications is ~27KB that is pretty neat and has the latest MDL version (v1.0.0).||The file size of a Bootstrap application depends on its jQuery that can be built (v3.3.5) version up to the gzip file size of ~64KB i.e., including jQuery and ~31KB i.e., excluding the jQuery.|
|16||MDL has fewer components than Bootstrap. The difference is that they are focused on building applications having modern material designs. These components come with beautiful default styles and amazing animations.||Bootstrap has the advanced grid system which includes column wrapping, offsets, reordering and hiding of columns.|
|17||However, MDL has recently been introduced in the market, but it has already become popular in the industry.||It’s been years Bootstrap has introduced. Due to its early introduction, it has gained an enormous community where N numbers of plugins, themes and blog posts have been produced.|